Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

Damped oscillatory magnetic field immunity testing evaluates whether robots, robot controllers, and their electronic subassemblies can withstand transient magnetic disturbances generated by switching operations in substations, power plants, and heavy industrial installations. Based on IEC 61000-4-10 and its Chinese equivalent GB/T 17626.10, this electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) immunity test is essential for robotic systems deployed in electrically harsh environments. This article explains the technical principle, applicable samples, test items, methods, and practical applications of the test.

Technical Overview

Damped oscillatory magnetic field (DOMF) immunity testing is a basic EMC immunity test defined in IEC 61000-4-10 and the corresponding national standard GB/T 17626.10. It simulates transient magnetic disturbances produced in medium- and high-voltage electrical installations, particularly during the operation of isolation breakers in high-voltage switchyards, the switching of capacitor banks, and fault-clearing events in power plants and primary distribution substations.

These switching events excite oscillatory currents in busbars and protective circuits, radiating a magnetic field that oscillates at characteristic frequencies of 0.1 MHz and 1 MHz and decays exponentially in amplitude. Under IEC 61000-4-10, the waveform is defined so that the field amplitude falls to 50 percent of its peak value within approximately 3 to 6 oscillation cycles, and the disturbance is applied to the equipment under test as a train of repeated bursts.

Robots are increasingly deployed inside or adjacent to such installations, including substation inspection robots, power plant maintenance robots, and industrial robots working near switchgear, induction heating equipment, and heavy welding lines. The transient magnetic field can couple into encoders, resolvers, Hall-effect sensors, magnetometers, current sensors, and motor drive electronics, causing position errors, communication interruptions, emergency stops, or uncontrolled motion. The damped oscillatory magnetic field test verifies that the robot continues to operate safely and within specification when exposed to these disturbances.

In a complete magnetic immunity program, the damped oscillatory magnetic field test is typically performed together with the power-frequency magnetic field test of IEC 61000-4-8 and the pulse magnetic field test of IEC 61000-4-9, covering the full range of quasi-static, impulse, and oscillatory magnetic threats.

Testing Samples

Industrial Robot Systems

Articulated six-axis robots, SCARA robots, delta pick-and-place robots, and Cartesian gantry systems, together with their robot controllers, servo drive units, power cabinets, and teach pendants, are tested to demonstrate conformity with generic industrial immunity standards such as IEC 61000-6-2 and EN 61000-6-2.

Collaborative and Mobile Robots

Collaborative robot arms, automated guided vehicles (AGVs), autonomous mobile robots (AMRs), mobile charging stations, and their navigation and localization modules may be evaluated, especially when they operate in factory environments containing high-power switching equipment.

Robots for Electrically Harsh Environments

Substation inspection robots, power plant crawlers, switchgear operation robots, rail-maintenance robots, and robots integrated into welding, smelting, or electrolysis lines represent the primary application group for this test, because their installation locations closely match the disturbance environment described in IEC 61000-4-10.

Robot Subassemblies and Components

Magnetically sensitive subassemblies such as absolute and incremental encoders, resolvers, magnetic safety sensors, programmable logic controller input/output modules, and safety controllers are frequently submitted for component-level immunity verification to support the integration of the complete robot system.

Testing Items

The core parameters verified during damped oscillatory magnetic field testing include:

  • Magnetic field strength severity: standard test levels of 10 A/m (level 3), 30 A/m (level 4), and 100 A/m (level 5), with 30 A/m commonly applied for general industrial locations and 100 A/m for equipment installed in or near high-voltage switchyards and power plants, subject to the applicable product or generic standard.
  • Oscillation frequencies: damped oscillatory disturbances at 0.1 MHz and 1 MHz.
  • Waveform damping characteristic: decay to 50 percent of the peak value within 3 to 6 oscillation cycles.
  • Burst application: repeated bursts applied for the specified dwell time at each test point.
  • Field orientation: exposure in the three orthogonal planes (X, Y, and Z) using the standard induction coil.
  • Performance criteria: evaluation of the equipment under test against performance criterion A (normal performance during and after the test) or criterion B (temporary degradation that is self-recoverable), as defined by the relevant product standard.
  • Associated magnetic immunity items: power-frequency magnetic field testing to IEC 61000-4-8 and pulse magnetic field testing to IEC 61000-4-9, which are usually executed within the same test campaign.

Testing Methods

Test Equipment and Calibration

Accredited third-party laboratories perform the test using a damped oscillatory magnetic field generator, a standard induction coil of 1 m by 1 m (or suitably dimensioned coils for large equipment), current monitoring instrumentation, and calibrated field measurement probes or search coils. Before testing, the test setup is calibrated in accordance with IEC 61000-4-10 to demonstrate that the required field strength is achieved and that field uniformity is maintained within the specified tolerance over the volume occupied by the equipment under test.

Test Setup and Procedure

The robot or component is placed in its representative operating configuration, connected to auxiliary equipment and load simulators as needed, and set to a defined operating mode. The induction coil is positioned so that the test field envelops the equipment, or is placed in close proximity for large equipment that cannot be surrounded. The damped oscillatory field is applied at each required severity level and frequency for a dwell time of at least 2 seconds per frequency and orientation, and the coil is then rotated or repositioned to expose the equipment in all three orthogonal planes. Throughout the exposure, the laboratory monitors the functional status of the equipment under test.

Evaluation of Results

After each exposure, the test report documents the applied field strength, frequency, orientation, dwell time, and any observed deviation of the equipment from its normal performance. The equipment passes if the observed behavior satisfies the performance criterion selected by the applicable standard, for example, maintenance of the safety functions and motion control accuracy of the robot without operator intervention.

Applications

Damped oscillatory magnetic field test reports are used in a wide range of engineering and compliance scenarios:

  • Regulatory compliance and market access: demonstrating conformity with generic industrial immunity requirements under IEC 61000-6-2, EN 61000-6-2, or GB/T 17799.2 in support of EMC declarations for regional regulations.
  • Power utility procurement: qualification of inspection and maintenance robots for deployment in high-voltage substations, converter stations, and generation plants.
  • Factory automation projects: verification that robots and control cabinets installed near switchgear, capacitor banks, and welding equipment will remain stable in service.
  • Research and development: identification of magnetic coupling paths into encoders, sensors, and drives during the design phase, enabling targeted shielding, filtering, and layout improvements.
  • Component selection and supplier qualification: independent verification that purchased encoders, sensors, and controller modules meet the immunity levels required by the system integrator.
  • Acceptance and periodic testing: demonstration of continuing immunity after hardware modifications, firmware changes, or major system upgrades.

FAQ

What is the difference between pulse magnetic field and damped oscillatory magnetic field testing?

The pulse magnetic field test of IEC 61000-4-9 simulates single transient events such as lightning-induced currents and fault interruption in low-voltage networks, whereas the damped oscillatory magnetic field test of IEC 61000-4-10 simulates the repetitive decaying oscillations typical of switching operations in high-voltage installations. Both tests use the same induction coil hardware but apply different waveforms and severity levels.

Which severity level applies to a robot?

The severity level is determined by the applicable product family or generic standard and the intended installation environment. Robots intended for general industrial areas are commonly tested at 30 A/m, while robots operating in or near high-voltage switchyards and power plants may be specified at 100 A/m. The exact requirement should be confirmed against the standard cited in the product specification or procurement contract.

Do all robots require this test?

No. The magnetic field immunity tests primarily apply to equipment installed in environments where significant magnetic disturbances exist, or to equipment containing magnetically sensitive components. Robots intended for residential or light commercial environments are usually covered by IEC 61000-6-1 or relevant product standards and may not include the damped oscillatory magnetic field requirement.

What constitutes a pass result?

A pass result means the equipment under test exhibited behavior satisfying the performance criterion defined by the applicable standard, for example, no loss of safety functions, no unintended motion, and no permanent degradation of performance during or after exposure to the specified field strength in all three orientations.

How should a robot be prepared for testing?

The robot should be delivered in its representative operating configuration with the controller, drives, teach pendant, necessary cabling, and auxiliary load simulators. A functional test plan describing the operating mode, monitored signals, and pass criteria should be agreed with the laboratory before the test begins.

How long does the test take?

The magnetic field exposure itself is short, since each orientation and frequency requires only a few seconds of dwell time. In practice, a complete magnetic immunity sequence covering power-frequency, pulse, and damped oscillatory fields typically requires several hours of laboratory time, depending on the size of the equipment, the number of operating modes, and the time needed for setup and functional verification.